From sheets to complete bed sets, we've got something for everyone Available in every colour, shape and size Also includes character items featuring favourites like Peppa Pig, Frozen and Mickey Mouse, all at great prices Hanover Pencil Pleat Curtains - Black Dorchester Bedding Sets -Cotton 1000 TC - White Lighthouse Duvet Cover Set Zurich Pencil Pleat Curtains - Gold Broadway Curtains - Duck Egg Blue Ionia Bedding Set - Indigo Paris City Cushion Cover Wild Poppies Bedding Set Emma Bridgewater Embroidered Duvet Cover Set Ritz Cotton 300TC Duvet 300TC - Cotton Cover Set - Cream Lace Hearts Bedding Set Animal Kingdom Bedding Set Welcome to HomeSpace Direct HomeSpace Direct, brings you bedding in every style, colour and size. Whether you want luxury bedding, with embroidery or appliqué on high thread count cotton or a budget range, simple, printed duvet cover for every day use, you will find it here. Many of our bedding and duvet cover ranges have matching curtains, throws, and cushion covers, to give you a complete bedroom transformation and are available in super king, king, double and single bed sizes.

Create the perfect tone for your room with our ready made curtains and matching cushion covers. Sheets, pillows, quilts, feather quilts and mattress protectors, or whatever you want for your bed, all available in this one stop. In our children's room, you will find the latest character children's bedding, to funky duvet covers for teenagers, which will make bedtime a joy. You can create a room that is pretty as a picture, or contemporary and striking, with clean lines and bold colours. Matching rugs, toy and storage boxes, will finish off a bedroom nicely. Our range is constantly evolving to encompass new ideas, trends and innovations, so sit back, grab a cup of tea, and take a leisurely look through our website, and turn your house, into a home.Take a look at our guides to creating space in a crowded home. and how to allergy proof your home.Get the website you want, with Webs. Over 55 million personal and professional websites created (so far).Galerie: Bed & Breakfast Villa Schönegg, Rüschlikon

Im einstigen Restaurant Bodrum an der Seestrasse in Rüschlikon weht ein frischer Wind – fast schon ein Sturm. Nach längerem Umbau steht die Villa Schönegg, wie das 130 Jahre alte Haus heisst, frisch herausgeputzt als Bed & Breakfast mit acht Zimmern und einem Restaurant und Café da. Ein 10-Quadratmeterzimmer (mit Sicht auf den See) gibt es bereits ab Fr. 70.– pro Nacht, die Übernachtung in der Suite «Schönegg» (mit Terrasse) kostet Fr. 180.– als Doppelzimmer.home classics blackout curtain panel bleeker Geführt wird das neuen B&B-Haus von den PR/Media-Experten Cristina Paoletti und Guido Käppeli (der gelernter Koch ist), Inhaber ist der bekannte Gastronom Marcel Capecchi (Mönchhof am See, Portofino).cowans curtains west bridgfordThe requested URL /cikk.php?cikk=1844 was not found on this server.spirella red poppy shower curtain

This week the news from around the world has focused on Dr Andrew Wakefield’s research. //freshloaf/archives/2011/01/06/…) were littered throughout the news like confetti at a wedding. According to the British Medical Journal Wakefield’s paper published 1998 in the Lancet linking the MMR vaccine to Autism was an ‘elaborate hoax’.  “A 1998 study that unleashed a major health scare by linking childhood autism to a triple vaccine was “an elaborate fraud,” the prestigious British Medical Journal ( BMJ) charged Thursday. The study by now-disgraced doctor Andrew Wakefield was blamed for a disastrous boycott of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine in Britain, and even had reverberations stretching to Canada, the United States, Australia and New Zealand.” This is simply untrue. Dr Andrew Wakefield has never at any time linked the MMR vaccine to Autism. Fact: Dr Andrew Wakefield did link Bowel Disease in children with Autism after they had received the MMR.

Therefore Dr Wakefield did not say that the MMR causes Autism. It is titled Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. “Background We investigated a consecutive series of children with chronic enterocolitis and regressive developmental disorder.” In the introduction he says: “We saw several children who, after a period of apparent normality, lost acquired skills, including communication. They all had gastrointestinal symptoms, including abdominal pain, diarrhoea, and bloating and, in some cases, food intolerance. We describe the clinical findings, and gastrointestinal features of these children.” Wakefield says ‘apparent normality‘. He is not saying of ‘normality’ because he is taking this from the mouths of the parents and other physicians and not his own observation. This is shown later in the study. It is important to remember that Wakefield was not studying the Autism link but bowel disorder link.

Wakefield was not and never has been an expert in Autism he was and is a Gastrointerologist. In the section ‘findings’ he states: Findings Onset of behavioural symptoms was associated, by the parents, with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination in eight of the 12 children, with measles infection in one child, and otitis media in another. All 12 children had intestinal abnormalities, ranging from lymphoid nodular hyperplasia to aphthoid ulceration. Note he says  ‘associated by the parents, with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination’. This is not Wakefield saying this but the parents. Now here is where I believe the confusion lies: “Interpretation – We identified associated gastrointestinal disease and developmental regression in a group of previously normal children, which was generally associated in time with possible environmental triggers.” Interpretation means that it is their interpretation of the results they found. This conclusion was made after speaking to the parents, and reading reports from health visitors, and general practitioners.

“ all had been assessed professionally elsewhere, so these assessments were used as the basis for their behavioural diagnosis.” Remember Wakefield was studying bowel disease not Autism. For me, the most important part of this whole study says: “In eight children, the onset of behavioural problems had been linked, either by the parents or by the child’s physician, with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination. Five had had an early adverse reaction to immunisation (rash, fever, delirium; and, in three cases, convulsions). In these eight children the average interval from exposure to first behavioural symptoms was 6·3 days (range 1–14).” This is very clearly stating that this link was made previously elsewhere and not by Wakefield. It also clearly indicates that other professionals linked the MMR vaccine to Autism. “Viral encephalitis can give rise to autistic disorders, particularly when it occurs early in life.15 Rubella virus is associated with autism and the combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (rather than monovalent measles vaccine) has also been implicated.

Fudenberg16 noted that for 15 of 20 autistic children, the first symptoms developed within a week of vaccination. Gupta17 commented on the striking association between measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and the onset of behavioural symptoms in all the children that he had investigated for regressive autism. Measles virus18,19 and measles vaccination20 have both been implicated as risk factors for Crohn’s disease and persistent measles vaccine-strain virus infection has been found in children with autoimmune hepatitis.21” Wakefield also states the following: “If there is a causal link between measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and this syndrome, a rising incidence might be anticipated after the introduction of this vaccine in the UK in 1988. Published evidence is inadequate to show whether there is a change in incidence22 or a link with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine.23” I feel that the word ‘if’ here is a very important factor. In fact the only definite statement I could find connecting the vaccination MMR to anything was made in the last paragraph.

“We have identified a chronic enterocolitis in children that may be related to neuropsychiatric dysfunction. In most cases, onset of symptoms was after measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation. Further investigations are needed to examine this syndrome and its possible relation to this vaccine.” I suggest reporters read crucial reports before joining in on bandwagon of lies being reported. Getting the facts is so important because lies breed lies, especially when this goes on to ruin the reputation of professionals. Before long no one knows what is correct which leads to total confusion. /2011…) reported yesterday that: “The BMJ claim results were faked so Dr Wakefield could suggest a link between vaccines, autistic conditions and bowel disease in children. National Autism Association argue that if the results were faked how is it that now: They report that Wendy Fournier of the US National Autism Association said: “Despite mounting scientific evidence worldwide confirming the presence of serious bowel disease in some children diagnosed with autism and evidence of a causal association with vaccines, health officials and medical professionals internationally continue to spin, deny and suppress the evidence,” said NAA president Wendy Fournier.  

”This latest attack by the UK medical profession through a journalist, who apparently has no source of income besides stories about Andrew Wakefield, is a continuing denial and failure to investigate either the contrary evidence that exists or the clinical histories of millions of children currently diagnosed with autism worldwide.” “The link between MMR and autism/bowel disease was carefully couched as one of a number of hypotheses the paper reviewed. The MMR hypothesis had appeared in medical journals before. As the paper’s aim was to review possible environmental triggers for the association between autism and bowel disease, the authors were duty bound to record the accounts of the parents of eight children that the onset of autism followed MMR. However, the paper expressly stated We did not prove an association between measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described (p.164), and recommended further research into this possibility – a responsible and legitimate conclusion to reach.”

This can be clearly seen on the section of the paper that I have shown above. The parents of the children in the original study have fully backed and supported Dr Wakefield to this day. They supplied statements to the GMC for the hearings. /2011/…) show news coverage of what Dr Wakefield had to say on the matter, they say: “Andrew Wakefield responds to allegations published in British Medical Journal [which it now turns out are yet another a rehash of journalist Brian Deer’s old work and not independent work of the BMJ].” The site Whale.to (http://whale.to/…) shows the film of what Dr Wakefield says lays behind the truth of the GMC hearings. This film in Dr Wakefield’s own words: “During the General Medical Councils Fitness to Practice Hearing, Dr Andrew Wakefield was interviewed by Alan Golding and asked a series of questions covering the work at the Royal Free Hospital and the subsequent GMC case . The film has never been viewed by the public.

From today World Autism Awareness Day 2010, at 10.00am GMT, the film will be released over the internet in a series of clips in which Dr Wakefield provides detailed answers and the truth behind the GMC hearing.” It is high time that the media stops blaming Dr Wakefield for the lack of parents taking up the MMR. This whole case has been designed to discredit Wakefield’s findings and use him as the scapegoat to cover up the truth. Thousands of parents worldwide link their children’s decent into Autism with the MMR and other vaccines. Wakefield has always continued to promote single vaccines something that I actually do not agree with. This clearly shows the man is not anti vaccine. His only “crime” as far as I can determine, is that he carried out a research study where the hypothesis was proven and on this basis he recommended that more research should be carried out. Thousands of professionals do studies of this kind daily. The only difference between them and Wakefield is the fact that his research implicates the MMR vaccine.